Friday, 30 August 2013

Trent Reznor and the Formula for Future Music Business Models


Trent Reznor is a classic example of how artists can make cash without being signed to a record deal. He demonstrates a simple formula that can be used in any business for selling a product.


CWF + RTB = $$$$
(Connect with audience) (reason to buy)

This formula seems very simple to put into practice, however its success is based upon how this is applied. This is where the Trent Reznor case study can be used as an example.

CWF:
To connect with the audience he conjured up an Internet scavenger hunt, in which you could win free gifts and tickets to his concerts. However… this website can only be located on the back of a concert t-shirt, where certain letters of the tour were highlighted and spelled out the website address. This gave a way for the fans to connect beyond the music.

Another form of ‘connecting with fans’:
He dropped USB sticks in the concert venue restrooms, containing new music. They would go home and discover the music, and share it with friends. Causing them to feel special and connected.

RTB:
Very simply, but well thought out…. The CD’s would change color when played. This is something that could not be pirated as an MP3 or download cannot duplicate changing colors.

He then performed the two together:
(cwf+rtb)

He gave his fans options of ways in which they could get hold of the music

1-    A free download of the first 9 songs.
2-    $5 for the whole 36 songs
3-    $10 for a two disk set
The next two options are the interesting ones (and the money makers)
4-    $75 for a deluxe package (box set)
5-    $300 for the ultra deluxe, which were also personally signed

The reason that that ultra deluxe was so expensive was the fact there only 2500 copies. This sped up the buying process and evidently it worked. They sold out in 30 hours and together made $750,000. Over the rest of the week, including the other options, they made 1.6 million dollars, WITHOUT a music label and with free music.

Other similar things he has done through the CWF+RTB formula:
CWF:

·      Download an album for free by simply giving your email address on his website.
·      Maps on Google earth to see where other people were downloading

RTB:
·      The same day concert listing came out so people could buy tickets immediately
·      The CD had exclusive content and material
·      There were lots of new and interesting opening acts, which you could also download (CWF).


His website constantly keeps up his connection with fans by……

Not just professional photos, but anyone who took concert photos and uploaded them to flickr, would go directly onto the website.
There were also wallpaper downloads, which would keep their music in mind.
There was the same appliance for videos and YouTube.
Probably the most important was his email to all his fans, this made him sound human, and put him on a personal level.

The formula can also be known as…

CWF- compete with free
RTB- back to business

Wednesday, 28 August 2013

How Piracy Effects My Original Ideas for Music Videos

Piracy makes it far more difficult for huge individual stars to emerge. As put by a journalist, " Rather than helping to create a rock 'n' roll revolution, the unwillingness to pay for music means more assembly-line artists." 

'Assembly-line artist' meaning, the cliche popular stars, such as Justin Bieber, Kylie Monogue, Katy Perry, Taylor Swift. All the classic popstars. They produce 'safe' music, something people are bound to like. This is not due to being unoriginal, but due to the threat that piracy produces. Because people can now download music for free, it means the music industry makes far far less money than in previous years, meaning there isn't room for any risk. They must produce something that has some chance of making money. 

This very much effected my first ideas for music videos. I went for three very cliche and likeable ideas, not too original or strange. As I realised that in realistic terms, if this was ever to be released it would have far more chance at making any money, if it were to be mainstream with an 'assembly-line artist'.

However, my first instinct when researching piracy was why hasn't anyone campaigned against this? But, when I looked deeper into it, I saw that some people had attempted this such as Lily Allen, or Lars Ulrich ( Metallica), and the public had severely knocked them down. Lily Allen was made the target of abuse and even death threats at her campaign for copyright enforcement, forcing her to ignore the issue. This shows how difficult it would be to tackle the issue for anybody, especially artists being claimed greedy. It proved to me that one of the only ways to make it out there is to follow the crowd and stay safe when producing music and stars. Essentially this means that any strange or new style of music could never truly make it to stardom, and the genres will continue. 

However I did find one upside to piracy when reading a quote stated by Liam Gallagher, "But as I understand the consumer didn't want Jimi Hendrix, but they got him- and it changed the world. F*** the customer. He doesn't know what he wants. You give it to him and he likes it."

The last part of the Quote above was the part that drew to my attention the most. If people are given something for free they'll take it, because its free, why not? Therefore in the world of piracy a band or artist could make it huge, but make no money, simply because people can listen to their music, people will, and the more do, the more people like it, the more hype it creates. After this, it could lead to bigger things and maybe people will start to buy the music, or buy concert tickets. Here I saw a way for independent music to find its way to the top. Although this method is not guaranteed by any means it is the only way I could see apart from taking the 'assembly-line' artist' approach. 

With regards to my music video it allowed me to think slightly more outside the box on one occasion and one of my ideas became original. Giving a tiny bit of hope that it might have a chance put into the real world.

However, from my experience of producing music video ideas, I do think that piracy is something that is stopping the music industry from allowing it's self to produce new and interesting music, though I cannot see away around this issue due to the previous reaction of the public.

Friday, 22 March 2013

Prelim to Main Task

  From our prelim to our thriller we have learned many new things. For example-


  • We had never touched upon sound track pro for our preliminary task and so our sound was of not very good quality. For our thriller however we used Sound Track Pro to add special effects which helped add to the mood of the sequence and made it much more professional.
For Example: Here we used a piercing sound effect to shock the audience and add drama.
  •  In our preliminary task we use only very basic camera angles and we only used a limited number of these. It therefore was quite amateur but since then we have learned all about the effects that different camera angles can have for films. In our thriller therefore we used many more different angles such as low angles to cast power over characters or higher angles to show them being powerless.


Here is an example of a high angle shot, we look down on the victim making him appear more vulnerable. this sort of thing was never used in our prelim.

As we can see from the two shots shown above, we also used special visual effects such as distortion and speed. When editing our prelim we didn't even know this was possible. It shows that we gave more time to discovering things about how to make our Thriller look more professional and shows that we spent a lot of time perfecting certain things such as the flash backs, giving the audience the shock factor that they expect.




As we can see in our Prelim, some of the shots are not linked up correctly. We see the end of an action without seeing the beginning as it is out of shot. For example-

Here is a wide shot of two people talking...
...it then cuts to her handing a gun. However we do not see her bringing up her hand or making and hint of doing this, therefore when we see the next shot it may become slightly confusing for viewers. It makes the sequence seem jolty and rushed.







An example of where we learnt how to fix this problem in our actual thriller is-

In the wise shot we see the detective leaning forward and starting to pull off the gaffer tape...


...it then cuts to a close up at exactly the same point as where the wide shot was cut. This all together looks seamless and keeps the sequence flowing.







All together the difference between our prelim and Thriller is clear. The visual and aural elements became far more advanced and took far more time to perfect. However the outcome was far more smooth and fits the conventions that we wished to include in our Thriller.

How we used technologies to make our thriller


In this YouTube clip of our thriller, we annotated certain areas going through how we used various technologies to create it...


Wednesday, 20 March 2013

How We Attracted Our Target Audience


How did we attract our target audience-

5

The perfect audience member to our film.

Our perfect audience members-

Meet jeremy!



He went to Eaton school. He speaks three languages fluently, latvian, english and french. His hobbies include poetry, painting, events planning. he considers himself to be a 'higher class' and matured at an early age, he was brought up by nannies in his country estate. He would enjoy our movie immensely as he would never have to face the paparazzi at the cinema as it would only ever be a box office. It wouldn't be too long, and so he could fit it into his busy schedule. he would enjoy the boyish nature of the killings and the slight horror aspect in which he could prove his bravery by watching. His favourite films and Tv programmes include the Davinci code, se7en and The town. Which share the same target audience.






His Best 'Mates' Rob and Steve- 


Rob and Steve did not go to eaton, they went to a public day school nearby. Jeremy enjoys having 'normal' friends other than the royalties that he is associated with. They  would enjoy the film also but for different reasons. They strive to be different, therefore dont conform to societies general standards and conventions. their music is alternative, such as the artic monkeys and the libertines. theyre favourite films include 500 days of summer and lost in translation. Watching a film in a different language will be 'cool' as not many latvian films are made. and will latet have the thrill of saying to their friends:
"OMG guys i watched a film in latvian the other day"
 to keep up their 'indie' reputation.